Відео

It was Canaan who had sexual intercourse with his grandmother and was found out by his father Hem.

cool cool cool very amazing organization ! it's making sense very quickly now.

All the laws came from God. In the new covenant, we don't have a theocracy. Now, we have separation of church and state. But everything that was bad then is bad now. Everything that was good then is good now.

🙏🏾 Amen!! Love this breakdown!!!! Thank you!!!

In 1 Cor 5 Paul is not teaching them how to keep the Passover. He is taking the information they already know about Passover and using it as a comparison to the situation he is writing to them about regarding the man committing sexual immorality. He is saying that a little yeast ruins all the dough. Just like at Passover we get all the leaven out of the house, so too, they must get this man committing sexual immortality out of their spiritual house. Full context always. Test everything.

We no longer follow ceremonial laws, since Jesus has replaced the sacrifice.

Are you guys Hebrew Roots movement at 119 Ministries?

We enter into his rest by faith and by ceasing from our own works to justify us to The works of Jesus christ, Christ is our righteousness and we obtain that by faith and our faith is accounted to us for righteousness and if you deny this fact you will lose your soul

Your a Coward. Y’all talked about Hebrew Israelites and turned off the comments not giving any HI any opportunity to refute what u said. Turn on the Comments on that post. That’s that crafty council the Bible Talks about

17:45 "Nowhere in the text is there any indication that the woman is even pregnant." - It's not describing any particular woman. It's general instruction. So any woman undergoing this procedure could be pregnant, either by her legitimate husband, or through adultery. And it's the scenario of pregnancy through adultery that is being asked about. You seem to be OK if it's God who is the abortion doctor. The criticism is about revealing the hypocrisy of the pro-life position.

It's with a very broad brush... The era of Christianity, just like judaism, just like religion, just like new age, the world's gospel is not the truth, the whole truth, nothing but the truth. Seek God, while you can still find him... This day and age, thats a loaded statement. People so offended by truth. Yours, mines, somebodies else's....

Wait a minute.. is this Marc Jacobs?

One theory is that it is an edited version of a Greek myth in which Zeus sees Chronos naked and castrates him; another is that his wife was a human-nephalim hybrid, and since the flood was supposed to destroy all hybrids, this caused the Canaanites (their children) to be hybrids, requiring the Hebrews to kill them later.

What about Acts chapter 10 9-16

Interesting. If you get a chance, check out this out on the topic of "under the law." The first one to plead his case seems right, Until another comes and cross-examines him.

What if Ham wasn't Canaan's father? And what if Ham's wife was pregnant of another man (whose Y-chromosome wasn't suppose to survive the deluge) while entering the arc? Perhaps one way or the other Noah found this out during the tent incident?

I thief, coming to God is no longer a thief, but the swine is still the swine even after crucifixion, animals don't change because of God's death, therefore they are not clean

I really like 119 ministries but the HS is giving me a lot of pause about this video. Everyone pray and due diligence on testing this. The animal sacrifices didn't offer forgiveness, but temporary cleanliness to draw near to God, in a temporary state. The work of Christ provides both bc we can't be both unclean and clean and in right standing with God at the same time. The blood of Christ and the presence of the HS within us provides both states. Christ gives us forgiveness AND right standing allowing us to come close to God. There are plenty of theologians who agree that Ezk was a foreshadowing of the 1st temple being demolished not a prophetic end times prophecy. Why would God need to clean us up(via animals) to be close to Him when His son came to do that and died for it? The references in the NT made about Paul and the apostles still going to the temple and the synagogue are not specific enough to draw the conclusion that they, themselves, were still making animal sacrifices. Even so the one where Paul was disciplined by James to pay for the men making a vow and to purify himself in doing so does not mean God expected it or desired it. It simply means Paul did it. We know throughout scripture Paul tells us constantly the spirit convicts him but the flesh is weak. Paul is not speaking on behalf of God here. Paul is a man. A sinful one. He is NOT Christ! You must compare Paul's actions and words to Christ and those who walked with Christ. Just like the OT, the Gospels record what did happen and not everything that is recorded is condoned by God. God did not condone David's adultery and murder of Bathsheba's husband! But, it is in scripture none the less. We know David was a man after God's heart and we see the sin. You have to test Paul's actions(and the other's) and compare it to certainty. The only thing certain here is that the blood of Christ is sufficient for the forgiveness of all sins bc everything else mentioned here is up for scrutiny. The people may have acted rebelliously or didn't understand the full impact yet of christ's death and resurrection, the OT prophecies are contested as being already fulfilled or not. Even so, just bc something is ok to do doesn't make it a requirement. It's ok to take communion more than 1 x a year but it doesn't make it necessary. For example- in the OT the gentiles and foreigners "could" participate in the Passover but if they did there were specific requirements on how. They were to be cicumcised and perform it exactly as God commanded but they did not HAVE to.

Another, I can learn from. Appreciate this message. Shalom

The BOOK OF THE COVENANT Is the Fulfillment of THE BOOK OF THE LAW. Both are Important.

The following text was found as a comment on a different video: The ten commandments are God's law which Jesus summed up in two - love God and love your neighbour. Which law God writes on the heart in The New Covenant arrangement. That is the law that is still and always will be in force. And it is not a law that we obey. It is a law we live by the indwelling Spirit of God. Do you know the difference between the two covenants? It is simply this: The Old Covenant was based on the wow, oath and promise of Israel to keep it. They could not even last 40 days before they set up the golden calf. Whereas The new Covenant is God's wow, oath and promise to cause His people to walk in and live by His law by the power of His indwelling Spirit. It is based on better promises - God's promise.

They don't disagree. James has a different audience to Paul. Gal 2:7 - KJV, VUL, Duoay Rheims Paul - Gospel OF UNcircumcision. Peter, John, James - Gospel OF circumcision.

So birthday's are ok...how would my friend who adopted from Africa and they didn't know his birthday day celebrate it? They picked a day...would that be ok? If that's ok then what would be the problem in picking a day(since we don't know) to celebrate the birth of Christ? It's not condoned nor condemned.

I really have a sincere question. I understand the problem with symbols but I also just finished reading in 1 Kings and how Jerohobim altered the Lord's feasts and alters etc... to his own time and in his own way rather than following God's design. He was condemned for this. Aren't we doing this with keeping the feasts and festivals since we can't do them exactly as God prescribed ? We therefor do them "as best we can" leaving out portions that can no longer be done and changing the way He told us to do them. I'm just curious if there has been a teaching addressing setting up the biblical feasts on man's timeline and way?

the creation must have some evidence of the Sabbath

Excellent teaching! Cleared up a few things for me. Thank you!

Shalom, tha was appreciated..

I have misunderstood Paul for many years and I am still on the fence about him but coming to a better peace about him since watching your videos. However, I never once questioned my Messiah- only Paul's authority was in question which I still think is a tad shady. I don't need Paul explaining Jesus to me for me to believe. The actual apostle's testimony was never confusing in any way and beside that the words of Christ are enough. I have no problem if Paul ends up being a good guy but let's just say I won't fall off my chair if I get to heaven and find out that Paul is the guy in Rev 2. Paul is irrelevant if you actually believe in Jesus and His 12 actual apostles. Paul is only necessary if you don't want the institution of modern church Christianity to crumble. Paul may be misunderstood. I suppose it's possible, but the bottom line is that misunderstood Paul is the modern church's messiah not Christ. They love their Paul so much they won't even look at Christ's words to call into question their confusion. Christ's words weren't confusing until Paul got a hold of them.

So can I eat shrimp or not?

Buddy do we live under the law still? Or are we under grace? You are teaching that we are still under the law. Has Christ got rid of the law? No. But has he fulfilled the law? Yes he has. So now we are under grace not under the law. If you say we must not eat certain foods because Leviticus says so, then I suppose we must still do animal sacrifices to atone for our sins as well. Or we must still stone those who commit adultery because the law of Moses teaches this.

The man in this video is using poor illustrations to try and make the scripture mean something else, when it’s plain and simple in the text

28 It seemed good to the Holy Spirit and to us not to impose any burden on you apart from the following requirements: Acts 15:28 [NIV] Looks like you forgot to quote the rest of this Scripture. Besides is not clear what the church is for you. Seems like you want to have a church called Israel without actually having Israel in it

Excelente estudio. Mil gracias!!!

GREAT STUFF👍🏼🤨🤔🧐❣️🌹🌎🇺🇸🇮🇱♾️💞✡️🌹🔯🌹🕎🌹✝️🌹♾️❣️🇺🇸🌹🇺🇦💞🇺🇲❣️

Great summary. Thanks!

That is a lie.Anybody who want to can make the effort, and go read the letters of Ignatius of Antioch, who incedidently was a disciple of John,in which he clearly told all Christians not to keep the Jewish sabbath,but celebrate the LORD's Day,as did the disciples as indicated in Acts 20:7, and also practised by John himself,as indicated in Rev.1:10.This were all done in the first, and second century,as Ignatius was martyred in approximately 107 A.D. Stop lying to people by denying the Truth of Scripture!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Based on 1Corinthians all women claimed to be serving God praying and prophesying with her head not hair uncovered is wrong. And head covering is part of submission to her head, and if she do not have a head like a husband she still need to honour Jesus, the wisdom in it is if she don't want to cover her head should may as well shave her head so she appears as a man which she still have to cover her head not her hair.

Whether it's a Saturday or a Sunday is not important. The important thing is rest one day in seven. Remember some people (IE doctors, nurses, police etc) have to work on these days and should not be shamed by those they are protecting.

@darciecoombs5050 I pray your husband gain’s patience with you. It’s very hard to change and do away with a lot of what you grew up with. It took my wife 15 years to see the things 119 teaches. She now observes the sabbath, to the best of her abilities, and more understands what the instruction (law) of YHVH is and means. She understands Yeshua came to not do away with YHVHs instruction but to help us better understand it ! You should try to watch 119s teaching called The Lost Sheep. But first pray about it and talk to your husband about watching it, ask him to be patient and understanding with you. It is an amazing story, truly amazing. Blessing and Shalom

Love your explanation, no faff simply stated, easy to understand. ❤

Acts 21:25 is an addition to the text. We know this from the facts #1 it's not in older manuscripts #2 it's not ever recognized as being a verse from any other outside writings such as the church fathers, etc. #3 the verse itself literally says "that they do no such things other than" or "they do no such things save ONLY" (something along those lines) which isn't in the original statement from the Jerusalem council. From these facts it's easy to see Acts 21:25 is an obvious addition.

Great stuff

Good teaching.We ought to obey GOD rather than man .

Since posting my comment over three years ago, and more intense study into the Hebrew words, I have a new understanding of the idea of kindling a fire. First, context matters. This command was part of the command to avoid any work on the sabbath. Because fire was used for many occupations, the prohibition of building a fire in their dwellings was probably to keep people from doing work that required a fire. Interestingly, the Syriac equivalent of the Hebrew word baar also has the idea of gathering or gleaning. This makes sense why the man who was gathering sticks in Numbers on Shabbat was stoned. It would have required work to go out and gather and chop firewood. Yah wanted his people to have a day of rest. That being said, and now understanding that the sabbath was made for man, and not man for the sabbath (Yeshua’s words), I believe it was permissible to have fire to keep warm, and to light one’s home. But the firewood should be gathered and stacked the day before Shabbat so as to avoid the hard work of going out to find and chop the wood. (The gathering of the manna the day before is somewhat related). I’m thankful to all the brethren who commented on my post, and who inspired me to re-examine my position.

Thanks for sharing ❤

The distinction between the Ten Commandments and the other laws of Moses lies in their origin, purpose, and nature: 1. **Origin**: - **Ten Commandments**: Also known as the Decalogue, these were given directly by God to Moses on Mount Sinai and were inscribed on two stone tablets (Exodus 20:1-17; Deuteronomy 5:4-21). - **Other Laws of Moses**: These include the ceremonial, civil, and moral laws that God gave to the Israelites through Moses, detailed primarily in the books of Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers, and Deuteronomy. 2. **Purpose**: - **Ten Commandments**: These are fundamental moral principles intended to guide the ethical and spiritual conduct of all people. They are seen as universal and timeless. - **Other Laws of Moses**: These laws include detailed regulations for worship (ceremonial laws), guidelines for social justice and community living (civil laws), and additional moral directives. They were specifically given to the nation of Israel to govern their religious, social, and political life. 3. **Nature**: - **Ten Commandments**: These commandments are concise and comprehensive, addressing broad principles of morality and worship. - **Other Laws of Moses**: These laws are more detailed and specific, covering a wide range of topics from dietary restrictions to procedures for sacrifices and festivals. 4. **Inscription**: - **Ten Commandments**: Written by the finger of God on stone tablets, symbolizing their permanence and divine authority (Exodus 31:18; Deuteronomy 9:10). - **Other Laws of Moses**: Written by Moses in a book (the Torah), indicating their role in guiding the daily life and worship of the Israelites (Deuteronomy 31:9). 5. **Significance in Christianity**: - **Ten Commandments**: Often viewed by Christians as still relevant and applicable, forming a basis for Christian ethics. - **Other Laws of Moses**: Many Christians believe that the ceremonial and civil laws were fulfilled by Jesus Christ and are no longer binding on Christians (Colossians 2:14-17; Hebrews 10:1-10). This distinction highlights the unique role of the Ten Commandments as a foundational moral code, while the other laws of Moses served to govern the specific covenant relationship between God and the nation of Israel.

Doctrine of demons

AWESOME Message was waiting on this ❤

Excellent teaching brother,i can't explain the happiness i got after understanding this depth of Holy Scriptures❤,God bless,shalom

The Torah is applicable only to those inside Israel. There is only one Law/Torah for both the native and the foreigner who lives within. You must be an Israelite or Assimilated/ Grafted Israelite to observe the Torah. You observe the Torah because you love the Father and His Messiah. Following the Torah is a consequence of being saved. We, the saved, are not under the Law/Torah but are under grace. We show our gratitude and love for the Father and His Messiah by observing the Torah. See the Parable of the Two Debtors. This is how Jeremiah 31:33 is accomplished. "If you love me obey my commandments." Lawlessness is Torahlessness.